2 slots available

Feature Discovery & Validation Sprint

Test your feature idea with a real prototype and real users, and walk away with a clear go or no-go — not a guess dressed up as a roadmap decision.

Know if it's worth building — before you spend a quarter building it.

A feature built on a hunch is a bet with your team's time. A feature built on assumptions from a boardroom is a bet with someone else's opinion. In between: a real prototype, tested by real users, before a single line of production code gets written.

What you get:

01

A clear go/no-go recommendation, backed by user feedback, not internal debate

A clear go/no-go recommendation, backed by user feedback, not internal debate

02

A testable prototype of the feature, not a slide deck describing it

A testable prototype of the feature, not a slide deck describing it

03

A scoped starting point for your team to build from, if the answer is go

A scoped starting point for your team to build from, if the answer is go

04

A clean synthesis of what users actually said, so the decision holds up to scrutiny

A clean synthesis of what users actually said, so the decision holds up to scrutiny

What is included

01

Problem Definition

Get precise about what you're actually testing.

  • Definition of the problem the feature is meant to solve, and for whom

  • A sharp framing of the hypothesis the sprint will validate

02

Market & Competitor Check

Know what's already out there.

  • Review of similar solutions already on the market

  • A clear read on what's differentiated about your version, if anything

03

Prototype

Something users can actually react to.

  • A simple, testable prototype of the feature concept

  • Built fast enough that validation, not polish, stays the priority

04

User Interviews & Feedback

Real feedback, real decision.

  • Interviews with users to validate — or invalidate — the concept

  • A clear go/no-go recommendation, with the reasoning behind it

  • A scoped starting point for your team to build from, if it's a go

How it runs.

Week 1 — Definition

Lock the problem, the hypothesis, and a quick check of what's already on the market.

Week 2 — Prototype

Build a simple, testable prototype of the feature concept — built for user reaction, not for polish.

Week 3 — Validation

Run interviews with real users, synthesize what surfaced, and deliver a clear go/no-go recommendation.

Who is this for

You have a feature idea or roadmap item you're not fully sure about

  • You'd rather spend three weeks validating than three months building the wrong thing

  • Your team is split on whether the feature is worth the investment

Who this isn't for.

You already have strong evidence the feature is needed and just need it built

  • You're looking for a full production build, not a validation prototype

  • You can't get access to real users in your target segment for interviews

Your questions
answered.

Your questions
answered.

01

Three weeks feels short to validate a whole feature.

The sprint validates one precise hypothesis about one feature, not your whole roadmap. That focus is what makes three weeks enough to reach a defensible decision.

02

What if the answer is no-go?

That's exactly the point. A clear no-go in week three is far cheaper than discovering it after a quarter of development — it's not a failure, it's runway saved.

03

Can you also build the feature if it's a go?

The sprint ends with a scoped starting point for your team. If you'd rather I take it further, that's a separate, follow-on engagement — happy to discuss on the call.

04

How is the price set?

Priced against the complexity of the feature and how many user segments it touches, not a flat rate. A single, well-defined feature is the starting tier; multi-segment or multi-flow ideas scope up from there.

Design services for products who grow fast.

Lightning Bolt

Timeline:

Timeline:

1–3 weeks

Next start:

Next start:

By agreement, ~1–2 weeks from booking

By agreement

~1–2 weeks from booking